Skip to content

Brought to you by

Dentons logo

US Tax Disputes

Keeping an eye on US tax controversy and litigation developments.

open menu close menu

US Tax Disputes

  • Home
  • About us
  • Property Tax
  • State and Local (Subnational) Taxation

IRS Issue BBA Guidance to Office of Appeals

By Jeff Erney
April 11, 2019
  • IRS
  • IRS Administration
  • IRS Examination Process
  • LB&I
  • Partnerships/TEFRA
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn

Recently, the IRS issued guidance for its Office of Appeals about the changes to partnership audit procedures under the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (“BBA”). BBA repealed the TEFRA partnership audit procedures “replacing them with an entirely new centralized partnership audit regime.” Unless a partnership elects out, the IRS may now assess and collect tax underpayments from the partnership rather than pursuing payment from the partners.

The Office of Appeals is an independent office within the IRS that generally attempts to resolve disputes at the conclusion of an audit.  Much of this guidance refers to internal Appeals procedures for handling cases under the BBA audit regime. A few things of note, however. First, this guidance reveals that the IRS is treating BBA appeals as a centralized issue and using many of the same employees who handled TEFRA audits. Second, as before, any case going to Appeals must have at least 365 days remaining on the statute of limitations.

Most importantly, this guidance reveals that the IRS has begun preparing for partnership audits under the new BBA procedures to begin reaching Appeals. It also signals that taxpayers may see a significant increase in the number of partnership returns being audited and going to Appeals. Indeed, BBA was enacted in part to ensure more audits of large partnerships.

Anticipating such an uptick in audits, taxpayers should be prepared for them and in particular ensure that their partnership agreements have been updated to ensure compliance with the new BBA rules. We have previously blogged about some of those rules here, here, and here.

If you have any questions about this post, please contact Jeff Erney at Jeffry.Erney@dentons.com or (202) 496-7511 or Peter Anthony at peter.anthony@dentons.com (202) 496-7961.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via email Share on LinkedIn
Subscribe and stay updated
Receive our latest blog posts by email.
Stay in Touch
Jeff Erney

About Jeff Erney

Jeff Erney is the chair of the US Tax Controversy practice, which was recognized by The Legal 500 in 2020 for outstanding work in contentious tax. Jeff focuses his practice on tax litigation and dispute resolution. When representing clients faced with complex issues, he draws on years of experience as a senior tax attorney for the Office of Chief Counsel with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), as well as his background as a certified public accountant (CPA), to most effectively provide counsel.

All posts Full bio

RELATED POSTS

  • General
  • IRS

Act Fast to Qualify for IRS Penalty Relief

By Mark A. Loyd, Bailey Roese, and Stephanie Bruns
  • General
  • IRS

Navigating the Latest IRS Updates on Employee Retention Credit Claims

By Gregory Rhodes and Mark A. Loyd
  • General
  • IRS
  • Litigation

Denver-Based Court of Appeals Issues Two Important Cannabis Rulings

By Jeff Erney

About Dentons

Redefining possibilities. Together, everywhere. For more information visit dentons.com

Grow, Protect, Operate, Finance. Dentons, the law firm of the future is here. Copyright 2023 Dentons. Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. Please see dentons.com for Legal notices.

Categories

Additional resources

Visit our Global tax guide to doing business in... 2024.

Dentons logo in black and white

© 2025 Dentons

  • Legal notices
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms of use
  • Cookies on this site